What would stop a gold prospector doing this in the arrow river,nothing mechanical about it.
Yea iv had the same idea Siphoning the water with gravitational push and the river flow doing the work a .
At that wee dam that is full of gravel? Has to be a shitload of gold in there…
Several pissed off claim owners would likely stop it…
Not on a claim I’m talking about the public area
I do not think you would get enough fall without a huge long length of hose would you?
Yea but it makes perfect sense to gravity dredge 0.8grams of gold with $6k of 4inch dredge hose. Let the clown go try it and be disapointed
I had a look on YouTube and found a guy in Taiwan doing it in certain spots with good vacume and bugger all hose .if I were to try it il use 110mm unpunched drainage pipe 30m $277 few floaty devices or coke bottles .ribbed hose just let it run for an hour after "dredging"an clean hose out .get the right creek an you’d get 2 -3mtr of head no worrys in under30 mtrs of hose .
Sounds like the go,and I dont need to do this nor will I try was a mere suggestion, im happy dredging with my 5 inch elsewhere, I’d use pipe like you said not dredge pipe as some other clowns reckon.
imagine getting a blockage half way down 30 m of hose , with stuff all suction , that be fun
Lol have tried this in arrow not enough drop in river worked little bit but would need abt 25m+ of hose i used 10m
Gravity dredging will be a waste of time in most situations. I’ve tried it myself yep. In summary I used a 30 metre length of novaflo. You’d be better off with pvc lengths of downpipe like they used on gold rush White water. The trouble with flexible pipe is it will pop up from the forces at work over and over again even with rocks holding it down. In concept gravity dredging is a sound idea just not too practical in most situations. Youll need a lot of gold to make it worthwhile. The pipe will get blockages in the bends. The main thing is the length needed and you’ll be working an area with good fall so lots of back and forwards. Really a 2 man operation as the work area will be out of sight of the sluicebox. I’d do it again but would limit it to a small waterway with small gravels and low volume of material to move. Was fun doing it at the time.
It’s consider “hydraulic dredging” still not technically legal because any action where material is moved other than by hand is considered mechanical in nature. Not organic.
Is saying that I have used it. It works but use a cage and limit how much material goes down the tube. All material displaces the water therefore lessoning the overall vaccume.